Showing posts with label separation of church and state. Show all posts
Showing posts with label separation of church and state. Show all posts

Monday, September 12, 2022

September 12, 1960: JFK and the Houston Baptists

September 12, 1960: Senator John F. Kennedy of Massachusetts, the Democratic Party's nominee for President, speaks before the Greater Houston Ministerial Association.

The 1st 34 Presidents had all been Protestants. Only in 1928 had a major party even nominated a Roman Catholic for the office, as the Democratic Party nominated Governor Alfred E. Smith of New York. Given how well the economy was going, the Republican Party's nominee, Herbert Hoover, would have been elected regardless of Smith's religion. But some vile anti-Catholic bigotry was let loose in the land, and Smith lost in a massive landslide.

Few Catholics had even tried for the Presidency since. Kennedy got the nomination, but, again, people said ridiculous things like "If Kennedy is elected, the Pope will take over America." After all, the Pope was, effectively, a dictator for the Church.

Dr. Norman Vincent Peale, one of the country's leading Protestant clergymen, said, "Faced with the election of a Catholic, our culture is at stake." He later said, "It is inconceivable that a Roman Catholic President would not be under extreme pressure by the hierarchy of his Church to accede to its policies with respect to foreign interests." He suggested that the election of a Catholic might even end free speech in America.

Former President Harry S Truman got off an interesting zinger, objecting to Kennedy's father, former Ambassador Joseph P. Kennedy, trying to "buy" the election: He said, "It's not the Pope that bothers me, it's the Pop!"

JFK knew that he had to address this. He also knew that Texas was a key State in the election, which was why he'd selected that State's Senator Lyndon B. Johnson as his running mate. He accepted the Greater Houston Ministerial Association's invitation to speak before them, and sought to allay their fears, and those of Protestant America:

While the so-called religious issue is necessarily and properly the chief topic here tonight, I want to emphasize from the outset that we have far more critical issues to face in the 1960 election: The spread of Communist influence, until it now festers 90 miles off the coast of Florida; the humiliating treatment of our President and Vice President by those who no longer respect our power; the hungry children I saw in West Virginia, the old people who cannot pay their doctor bills, the families forced to give up their farms; an America with too many slums, with too few schools, and too late to the moon and outer space. 

These are the real issues which should decide this campaign. And they are not religious issues, for war and hunger and ignorance and despair know no religious barriers. 

But because I am a Catholic, and no Catholic has ever been elected President, the real issues in this campaign have been obscured, perhaps deliberately, in some quarters less responsible than this. So it is apparently necessary for me to state once again, not what kind of church I believe in, for that should be important only to me, but what kind of America I believe in. 

I believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute; where no Catholic prelate would tell the President, should he be Catholic, how to act; and no Protestant minister would tell his parishoners for whom to vote; where no church or church school is granted any public funds or political preference; and where no man is denied public office merely because his religion differs from the President who might appoint him or the people who might elect him.

I believe in an America that is officially neither Catholic, Protestant nor Jewish; where no public official either requests or accepts instructions on public policy from the Pope, the National Council of Churches or any other ecclesiastical source; where no religious body seeks to impose its will, directly or indirectly, upon the general populace or the public acts of its officials; and where religious liberty is so indivisible that an act against one church is treated as an act against all. 

For while this year it may be a Catholic against whom the finger of suspicion is pointed, in other years it has been, and may someday be again, a Jew, or a Quaker, or a Unitarian, or a Baptist. It was Virginia's harassment of Baptist preachers, for example, that helped lead to Jefferson's Statute of Religious Freedom. Today, I may be the victim. But, tomorrow it may be you; until the whole fabric of our harmonious society is ripped at a time of great national peril. 

Finally, I believe in an America where religious intolerance will someday end, where all men and all churches are treated as equal, where every man has the same right to attend or not attend the church of his choice; where there is no Catholic vote, no anti-Catholic vote, no bloc voting of any kind; and where Catholics, Protestants and Jews, at both the lay and pastoral level, will refrain from those attitudes of disdain and division which have so often marred their works in the past, and promote instead the American ideal of brotherhood. 

That is the kind of America in which I believe. And it represents the kind of Presidency in which I believe, a great office that must neither be humbled by making it the instrument of any one religious group nor tarnished by arbitrarily withholding its occupancy from the members of any one religious group. I believe in a President whose religious views are his own private affair, neither imposed by him upon the nation, or imposed by the nation upon him as a condition to holding that office. 

I would not look with favor upon a President working to subvert the First Amendment's guarantees of religious liberty. Nor would our system of checks and balances permit him to do so. And neither do I look with favor upon those who would work to subvert Article VI of the Constitution by requiring a religious test, even by indirection, for it. If they disagree with that safeguard, they should be out openly working to repeal it.

He mentioned that, earlier in the day, he had visited the Alamo in San Antonio, site of a famous battle in 1836. He continued:  

Side by side with Bowie and Crockett died McCafferty and Bailey and Carey. But no one knows whether they were Catholic or not. For there was no religious test at the Alamo. 

The key words soon came:

Contrary to common newspaper usage, I am not the Catholic candidate for President. I am the Democratic Party's candidate for President, who happens also to be a Catholic. I do not speak for my Church on public matters. And the Church does not speak for me. 

Whatever issue may come before me as President -- on birth control, divorce, censorship, gambling or any other subject -- I will make my decision in accordance with these views, in accordance with what my conscience tells me to be the national interest, and without regard to outside religious pressures or dictates. And no power or threat of punishment could cause me to decide otherwise. 

But if the time should ever come -- and I do not concede any conflict to be even remotely possible -- when my office would require me to either violate my conscience or violate the national interest, then I would resign the office. And I hope any conscientious public servant would do the same. 

But I do not intend to apologize for these views to my critics of either Catholic or Protestant faith. Nor do I intend to disavow either my views or my Church in order to win this election. 

If I should lose on the real issues, I shall return to my seat in the Senate, satisfied that I had tried my best, and was fairly judged. But if this election is decided on the basis that 40 million Americans lost their chance of being President on the day they were baptized, then it is the whole nation that will be the loser, in the eyes of Catholics and non-Catholics around the world, in the eyes of history, and in the eyes of our own people. 

But if, on the other hand, I should win the election, then I shall devote every effort of mind and spirit to fulfilling the oath of the Presidency -- practically identical, I might add, to the oath I have taken for 14 years in the Congress. For without reservation, I can "solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States," so help me God. 

Kennedy won Texas. He won the Electoral Vote, beating the Republican nominee, Vice President Richard Nixon, 303-219, with 15 votes going to a 3rd-party candidate, Senator Harry Byrd of Virginia. Kennedy barely won the popular vote, 49.72 percent to 49.55, a margin of 112,827.

Kennedy won the Catholic vote, 78 percent to 22. Nixon won the Protestant vote, 62-38. The difference may have been in the black vote, as Dr. Martin Luther King may have swayed their Protestants in enough States to make the difference.

Occasionally, politically-themed comedian Mark Russell, himself a Catholic, would tell his audience that JFK was elected, "thus paving the way for all the Catholic Presidents since." The audience laughed, because there hadn't been any other Catholic Presidents. The Republicans had never nominated any, and the Democrats had unsuccessfully nominated Michael Dukakis in 1988 and John Kerry in 2004. In 2020, Joe Biden finally became the 2nd Catholic to be elected. Russell did live to see it. (UPDATE: Russell died in 2023.)

*

September 12, 1960 was a Monday. There were only 2 scores on this historic day -- Monday Night Football was still 10 years away -- and they were in baseball. The Pittsburgh Pirates beat the San Francisco Giants, 6-1 at Forbes Field in Pittsburgh. Dick Stuart, he of the powerful bat and the "strange glove," hit a home run. Roberto Clemente went 2-for-4 with an RBI. Willie Mays went 0-for-4.

And the Milwaukee Braves beat the St. Louis Cardinals, 4-2 at the 1st ballpark named Busch Stadium, which had been the last ballpark named Sportsman's Park. Warren Spahn, his legend secure, outpitched Bob Gibson, whose legend was yet to come. Joe Adcock hit a home run. Hank Aaron went 0-for-4. So did Stan Musial.

Sunday, July 3, 2022

July 3, 1905: France Finally Separates Church and State

Émile Loubet

July 3, 1905: The Chamber of Deputies, the lower house of France's national legislature, passes a bill for the separation of church and state, 341 to 233. It becomes law in the nation's Third Republic, and remains so into its Fifth Republic.

This is bigger than it might appear to a 21st Century audience. It is often presumed that the French Revolution of 1789 to 1795 fully overturned the established order, known as the Ancien Régime. Certainly, there was a desire to overturn the Roman Catholic Church, as much as there was to overturn the royal House of Bourbon. Writer and philosopher Denis Diderot, who died a few years before the Revolution, is credited with saying, "Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest."

But the Revolution fell into the Reign of Terror, and ultimately failed. The stated ideals of Liberté, égalité, fraternité -- liberty, equality and brotherhood --  were tossed aside for the dictatorship, and then the empire, of Napoleon Bonaparte.

This was followed by a conservative retrenchment, a new monarchy that teamed up with the Church to reassert the old values and turn back a few attempted revolutions, including the June Rebellion of 1832, the centerpiece of Victor Hugo's 1862 novel Les Misérables. This was followed by the Second Empire, run by Napoleon's grandnephew, Emperor Napoleon III, before it fell in the Franco-Prussian War in 1870. The Third Republic was subsequently founded.

The Dreyfus Affair that began in 1894 uncovered a considerable amount of anti-Semitism in France, particularly among the nation's Catholics. Finally, in 1905, President Émile Loubet wanted full separation. His popularity, having grown through his settling of the Dreyfus Affair and his diplomacy in building the Triple Entente with Britain and Russia, helped to pass it.

And so, 116 years after 1789, when France had its Revolution, and America's Bill of Rights enshrined freedom of religion into the First Amendment to its federal Constitution, France also had an official separation of church and state -- something that Canada took until 1982, with its Charter of Rights and Freedoms, to have; and that Britain still does not have, as it is officially tied to the Church of England. France has been a largely secular nation ever since, though Catholicism remains the leading religion.

Speaking of Canada: It has been noted that, due to its separation from France proper, the Canadian Province of Quebec, formerly known as New France, faced a tighter grip from the Church than did the "mother country." It would take until the "Quiet Revolution" of the 1960s for that grip to be broken.

This is not to say that the Catholic Church said, "Oh well, we lost this one. Let's move on." Hardly. On February 11, 1906, Pope Pius X wrote a papal open letter titled Vehementer Nos, which is Latin for "We strongly." Given that the Pope is, technically, the Church's monarch, he was speaking for the Church and using "the Royal We."
Pope Pius X

He wrote, "Our soul is full of sorrowful solicitude and Our heart overflows with grief... How, indeed, could it be otherwise, immediately after the promulgation of that law which, by sundering violently the old ties that linked your nation with the Apostolic See, creates for the Catholic Church in France a situation unworthy of her and ever to be lamented?"

He said the new law "must be deplored by all the right-minded." Why? Because it was "disastrous to society as it is to religion." He called it a "great calamity." He wrote, "That the State must be separated from the Church is a thesis absolutely false, a most pernicious error." And why is that? Because it was "a great injustice to God."

God's thoughts on the matter were not recorded by the media that existed at the time.

*

July 3, 1905 was a Monday. Johnny Gibson was born. From my original hometown of Bloomfield, New Jersey, he was a runner who competed in the 1928 Olympics in Amsterdam, although he did not win a medal. He later served as the longtime track & field coach at Seton Hall University, and lived to be 101 years old.

These baseball games were played that day:

* The New York Highlanders beat the Philadelphia Athletics, 5-0 at Hilltop Park in Upper Manhattan. Al Orth, a pitcher known as "The Curveless Wonder," pitched a 4-hit shutout. Willie Keeler went 3-for-4 with an RBI for the Highlanders, who became the New York Yankees in 1913.

* The New York Giants beat the Philadelphia Phillies, 9-1 at National League Park (later renamed Baker Bowl) in Philadelphia.

* The Brooklyn Superbas beat the Boston Beaneaters, 2-1 at Washington Park in Brooklyn. The Superbas became the Brooklyn Dodgers in 1911, and the Boston team became the Braves in 1912.

* The Boston Americans, forerunners of the Red Sox, beat the Washington Senators, 6-2 at the Huntington Avenue Grounds in Boston.

* The Pittsburgh Pirates beat the Cincinnati Reds, 4-3 at Exposition Park in Pittsburgh. Honus Wagner went 2-for-3 with a walk and an RBI.

* And the Chicago White Sox, the Cleveland Naps (forerunners of the Indians and the Guardians), the Detroit Tigers, the St. Louis Browns, the Chicago Cubs and the St. Louis Cardinals were not scheduled.

Sunday, April 17, 2022

April 17, 1982: Canada Gets a Charter of Rights and Freedoms

The Queen (in green) signs, as Trudeau looks on

April 17, 1982: Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britain signs the Constitution Act, 1982, "patriating" the Constitution of Canada. Until then, the British Parliament could still amend that Constitution, created by the British North America Act of 1867.

That act made Canada a separate country in the British Empire, but not fully independent. As the years passed, various acts made the country more and more independent, but still not fully so, as the Empire became the British Commonwealth.

Pierre Trudeau became Prime Minister of Canada, and thus the nation's head of government, in 1968. In his previous post, as Minister of Justice to Prime Minister Lester Pearson, he had expanded the country's freedoms. But he knew that the patriation of the Constitution would eventually be necessary. Eventually, the British Parliament, under their Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher, agreed.

As Canada's head of state, Queen Elizabeth signed the Act at the Canadian Parliament in the national capital of Ottawa, Ontario. Immediately afterward, Trudeau signed it. The British monarch remains head of state for Canada, but with very little power over the nation.

The Act included the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It is not just Canada's answer to the Bill of Rights in the Constitution of the United States: It goes further than that, enacting into law the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

It also granted Canada full separation of church and state: While the Church of England overall, and the Roman Catholic Church in Quebec and in other pockets within the country, had long had some power, no longer would they be able to dictate to any citizen of Canada to violate their conscience.

*

April 17, 1982 was a Saturday. The Stanley Cup Playoffs were underway, but no games were played that day. The NBA was still in its regular season, and these 3 games were played:

* The New Jersey Nets beat the Detroit Pistons, 147-132 at the Silverdome in the Detroit suburb of Pontiac, Michigan. Ray Williams scored 52 points for the Nets.

* The Denver Nuggets beat the Dallas Mavericks, 130-124 at the McNichols Arena in Denver.

* And the Seattle SuperSonics beat the Golden State Warriors, 95-94 at the Oakland Coliseum Arena.

Football was out of season. But a full slate, and then some, of Major League Baseball games was played:

* The New York Yankees lost to the Detroit Tigers, 5-3 at Tiger Stadium in Detroit. Bobby Murcer hit a home run, but Jack Morris outpitched Tommy John.

* The New York Mets beat the Montreal Expos, 2-1 at Shea Stadium.

* The Boston Red Sox beat the Toronto Blue Jays, 5-4 at Fenway Park in Boston. Carl Yastrzemski went 1-for-4, his hit being a triple.

* The Chicago Cubs beat the Pittsburgh Pirates, 10-2 at Three Rivers Stadium in Pittsburgh.

* The Kansas City Royals beat the Cleveland Indians, 12-10 at Cleveland Municipal Stadium.

* The Chicago White Sox swept a doubleheader from the Baltimore Orioles at Comiskey Park in Chicago. The Pale Hose won the opener, 3-1; and the nightcap, 10-6. Rookie Cal Ripken Jr. went 0-for-3 in the 1st game, and didn't play in the 2nd game. His streak began 13 days later. Eddie Murray went 5-for-5 in the nightcap, but with no RBIs.

* The Texas Rangers beat the Milwaukee Brewers, 5-3 at Milwaukee County Stadium.

* The St. Louis Cardinals beat the Philadelphia Phillies, 6-0 at Busch Memorial Stadium in St. Louis. Joaquín Andújar pitched a 3-hit shutout, allowing a double to Gary Mathews, and singles to Pete Rose and Dick Davis. Mike Schmidt did not play. Steve Carlton only lasted 5 innings.

* The Atlanta Braves beat the Houston Astros, 2-1 at the Astrodome in Houston.

* The San Diego Padres beat the Los Angeles Dodgers, 4-3 at Jack Murphy Stadium in San Diego.

* The California Angels beat the Minnesota Twins, 6-2 at Anaheim Stadium. (It was renamed Edison International Field in 1998, and Angel Stadium of Anaheim in 2004.) Brian Downing hit 2 home runs, Rod Carew went 1-for-4 with 2 RBIs, and Reggie Jackson went 1-for-3.

* The Cincinnati Reds beat the San Francisco Giants, 8-2 at Candlestick Park in San Francisco. Paul Householder hit a home run, and Johnny Bench went 3-for-4 with an RBI.

* And the Oakland Athletics beat the Seattle Mariners, 10-3 at the Kingdome in Seattle. The A's got home runs from Dwayne Murphy, Jim Spencer and Davey Lopes. Rickey Henderson went 2-for-4 with a walk, 2 stolen bases (on his way to a record 130 that season) and an RBI.

Also, Arsenal defeated Nottingham Forest, 2-0 at Highbury.

December 31, 1999 & January 1, 2000: The Millennium

December 31, 1999:  The Millennium arrives. The people of planet Earth survived. At a terrible cost. But we hadn't destroyed ourselves. ...